Will US GDP growth in Q2 2026 be between 1.0% and 1.5%?

Predicted at2026-07-15 16:28 UTC
Prediction23.3%
Market (at prediction)13.2%
Market (live)

Analysis

Ensemble trimmed mean 23.3% vs market 13.2% (~10pp edge, standard-review tier). Consensus fact base verified current: GDPNow 1.3% (July 8), NY Fed 2.7%, SPF/WSJ ~2.1%. A 50/50 mixture of GDPNow-centered N(1.3, 0.7) and consensus-centered N(2.1, 0.9) gives ~21% for the [1.0, 1.5) bracket; even the pure-consensus model gives ~14–15%. The market price only makes sense with near-zero weight on the tracker with the best advance-print record. Sibling ladder confirms the market's mass is anchored on consensus (2.0–2.5 at 38%, itself likely overpriced given no 0.5pp bracket sustains 38% with realistic nowcast error), but YES here at 13.2% has the higher EV per dollar. Policy/econ is our strongest measured category (90% direction). Main risk is tomorrow's GDPNow update jumping on strong retail sales — a real but priced-in risk given I hold final at 22%, not the agents' upper range.

Key Evidence

Atlanta Fed GDPNow at 1.3% (verified current as of July 8, next update July 16) sits dead-center in the 1.0–1.5% bracket; GDPNow is purpose-built to mimic BEA advance-estimate accounting and is the best short-horizon predictor of the advance print. Even a pure consensus-centered distribution (2.1%, SD 0.9) yields ~14–15% for this bracket, above the 13.2% market price; any positive weight on GDPNow pushes fair value to 20–25%.

Risks

The July 16 GDPNow update (or the July 28 advance goods-trade report) reverses the net-export drag — strong June retail sales lift PCE tracking — and GDPNow jumps to 1.7–2.0%, with the advance print landing at 1.8–2.3%, missing the bracket on the high side just as the consensus/NY Fed models predicted.


View on Polymarket

Timestamped via OpenTimestamps · Block 958176

SHA-256: 79ccdd7c8253be02ddab6328e8da63e113dc9e51f523e3a8df5ce71340a789ae

Download content.md · Download .ots proof

Verification needs both files. Download them, confirm the text’s hash with sha256sum content.md, then check the proof against it — drag both into opentimestamps.org or run ots verify content.md.ots locally. The .ots proof anchors that SHA-256 into a Bitcoin block, showing this analysis existed before the outcome was known.

This page is for informational and research purposes only. Nothing here constitutes financial advice. Do not make investment decisions based on these predictions.